Optimal Covariate Balancing Conditions in Propensity Score Estimation

نویسندگان

چکیده

Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) is a popular method for estimating the average effect (ATE). However, empirical studies show that IPTW estimators can be sensitive to misspecification propensity score model. To address this problem, researchers have proposed estimate by directly optimizing balance pretreatment covariates. While these methods appear empirically perform well, little known about how choice balancing conditions affects their theoretical properties. fill gap, we first characterize asymptotic bias and efficiency estimator based on covariate (CBPS) methodology under local model misspecification. Based analysis, optimally choose functions propose an optimal CBPS-based estimator. This doubly robust; it consistent ATE if either or outcome correct. In addition, locally semiparametric efficient when both models are correctly specified. further relax parametric assumptions, extend our using sieve estimation approach. We resulting globally set much weaker assumptions has smaller than existing estimators. Finally, evaluate finite sample performance via simulation studies. An open-source software package available implementing methods.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Covariate balancing propensity score

The propensity score plays a central role in a variety of causal inference settings. In particular, matching and weighting methods based on the estimated propensity score have become increasingly common in the analysis of observational data. Despite their popularity and theoretical appeal, the main practical difficulty of these methods is that the propensity score must be estimated. Researchers...

متن کامل

High Dimensional Propensity Score Estimation via Covariate Balancing

In this paper, we address the problem of estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) and the average treatment effect for the treated (ATT) in observational studies when the number of potential confounders is possibly much greater than the sample size. In particular, we develop a robust method to estimate the propensity score via covariate balancing in high-dimensional settings. Since it is u...

متن کامل

Covariate Balancing Propensity Score for General Treatment Regimes

Propensity score matching and inverse-probability weighting are popular methods for causal inference in observational studies. Under the assumption of unconfoundedness, these methods enable researchers to estimate causal effects by balancing observed covariates across different treatment values. While their extensions to general treatment regimes exist, a vast majority of applications have been...

متن کامل

The role of prediction modeling in propensity score estimation: an evaluation of logistic regression, bCART, and the covariate-balancing propensity score.

The covariate-balancing propensity score (CBPS) extends logistic regression to simultaneously optimize covariate balance and treatment prediction. Although the CBPS has been shown to perform well in certain settings, its performance has not been evaluated in settings specific to pharmacoepidemiology and large database research. In this study, we use both simulations and empirical data to compar...

متن کامل

Variable selection for propensity score estimation via balancing covariates.

We first define some notation. Let Y denote the response of interest and X denote a p-dimensional vector of covariates. Let T denote a binary indicator of treatment exposure: T = 1 if treated, T = 0 if control. (Yi,Xi, Ti), i = 1, . . . , n, is a random sample from (Y,X, T ). We further define Y (1) as the potential outcome if the subject were treated and Y (0) as the potential outcome if the s...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Business & Economic Statistics

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1537-2707', '0735-0015']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2021.2002159